The main clause of
Act 120 is: ‘Those with reduced life can and should be allowed a way out.’
As always, the
pedantic were the first on the scene, diverting attention to the least
ambiguous, that being ‘reduced life’ in this case. Who, with all their senses still intact, has
any doubt about that? Then, it was the turn of the do-gooders insisting on a
humane ‘way out’. They were as cantankerous as trade unions and as amenable to
amicable settlements via generous gifts to the leaders. The amicable, and
reasonably humane, ‘way out’ was not difficult to decide.
The person availing the
Act can choose from a wide range of pick-up vehicles–a limo for the rich or a
shared van for the eco-friendly–and also decide whether to keep the final
journey public or private, with a select or no crowd. There is no choice about
the destination though; it is the waste-to-energy plant on the city-outskirts.
Contrary to the expectations or prejudices of many, this remarkably clean,
modern and efficient unit can rival the corporeal and spiritual purposes of the
best graveyards and crematoriums.
Till date there has
been only two glitches, in the process and not in the Act per se. The first was
an identity crisis. The online application was filled out by well-meaning or
not-so-well-meaning others on behalf of one. Stringent checks were put in
place, including an online test to make sure one had most of one’s senses. The
second involved logistics and metaphysics. A few wanted to withdraw their
application. Even if processing and collection costs are minimal, the important
question remains: how can a fickle or feverish mind make a reduced life less
reduced? It was decided that one cannot change one’s mind after applying to be
a zero.
No comments :
Post a Comment